How Lucille became Joan Crawford
As a child Lucille LeSueur went by "Billie". When she arrived at MGM, publicity head Pete Smith decided "LeSueur" wouldn't work on a marquee.
Instead of choosing a name inside the studio, Smith ran a "Name the Star" contest in Movie Weekly and let readers pick. The winner was "Joan Arden", but another actress already used that name, so the studio went with the alternative: Joan Crawford.
She was never fond of it. She wanted her first name pronounced "Jo-Anne" and said she hated "Crawford" because it sounded like "crawfish", but she also admitted she "liked the security" that came with it.
Did the new name score better?
We ran both names through the HollywoodScore algorithm, which rates names on seven phonetic signals. Lucille LeSueur scores 68/100; Joan Crawford scores 69/100 (+1). The new name scores 1 points higher. Most of the gain comes from name rhythm (65 → 100) and syllable balance (72 → 95), partly offset by a drop in sound echo (100 → 30).
Lucille LeSueur's 6 syllables sit just outside the ideal 3–5 range.
Lucille and LeSueur have a workable rhythm — close to the perfect punch.
Lucille LeSueur's softer consonants cost it screen presence.
Matching "L"s make Lucille LeSueur an instant sonic hook.
Lucille (7 letters) and LeSueur (7) are balanced in length — clean on any poster or marquee.
Lucille LeSueur's uncommon phonemes make it harder for audiences to latch on.
Lucille LeSueur has decent vowel richness, but stronger A and O sounds would lift it.
Joan Crawford's 3 syllables (1 + 2) hit the Hollywood sweet spot.
Joan's 1 beat vs. Crawford's 2 create a natural cinematic snap.
Joan Crawford's softer consonants cost it screen presence.
Joan Crawford misses the alliteration hook that makes names stick.
Joan (4 letters) and Crawford (8) have a slight length mismatch, but it reads fine on screen.
Joan Crawford has mostly familiar phonemes with a few tricky patterns.
Joan Crawford's open vowels roll off the tongue — warm and screen-ready.
See the full Joan Crawford score card → · Head-to-head comparison →
Sources
Last updated · Spotted an error? Tell us.