W. C. Fields's 2 syllables sit just outside the ideal 3–5 range.
W.'s 1 beat vs. C. Fields's 1 create a natural cinematic snap.
W. C. Fields's softer consonants cost it screen presence.
W. C. Fields misses the alliteration hook that makes names stick.
A 6-letter gap between W. and C. Fields throws off the poster balance.
W. C. Fields has mostly familiar phonemes with a few tricky patterns.
W. C. Fields has decent vowel richness, but stronger A and O sounds would lift it.